>
> wax.start("car").text("Prius").end().close();
>
> You'd have:
>
> altWax.start("car").text("Prius").end("car");
>
Both of these look fine when you're writing literal text. But how does
it work when you're working your way down a Java hierarchy translating
it into an XML heirarchy?
Here I think I feel more comfortable with the way I do it today, with an
XMLStreamWriter:
public void toXML(XMLStreamWriter out) {
out.startElement("car");
for (Part part: getParts()) {
part.toXML(out);
}
out.endElement();
}
I agree that the redundant name in the endElement call can be very
useful when debugging. Make it optional.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
