On 05/09/2011 09:17, Jesper Tverskov wrote:
> How can you write "however more useful in a polyglot context" and then
> end up saying: "and is just banned in polyglot..."?
>
well by "polyglot context" I meant "situations where you want to serve
the same file as text/html or application/xhtml+xml and get equivalent
behaviour., But polygot spec doesn't aim for equivalent behaviour it
aims for identical DOM, which is harder to achieve.
> Does it mean that we should use it in polyglot anyway or what?
Personally, yes I think it should be allowed, the spec already allows
some differences from white space parsing in attribute values, and this
isn't a lot different.
see the comment
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13604#c3
(That bug report is still open)
David
--
google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________