Michael Kay scripsit:
> I've previously proposed something close to this, but with the rules
> defined at the XML syntax level:
This seems like a very clever design.
> The namespace :org.w3c.xml and corresponding prefix "xml" are always in
> scope even though there is no containing element in this namespace.
Does this mean that namespaces like :foo:bar:xml are not permitted?
I'd be okay with that.
--
You know, you haven't stopped talking John Cowan
since I came here. You must have been http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
vaccinated with a phonograph needle.
--Rufus T. Firefly
