Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?

> As Greg points out: do what you can to make it "feel" consistent for
> users.  For instance: camelCase for new types vs. hyphen-delimited for
> new actions.  One *can* distinguish between XSLT and WXS in that way:
> schema defines "things", xslt defines "actions".  So, hyphenate your
> actions, camelize your things.

better yet, caramelize your things.