Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question

From
mozer <>
To
David Lee <>
Date
2012-02-28T19:27:58Z
ID
<CAKdwC_Mm3NOyaE09L=LDdfxBNg+ffu6h2aU6M4HSs=>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question
No it just mean that attribute have a parent (the relation parent/child is not symmetric because of attributes)

Xmlizer

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:49 PM, David Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know what you mean, it's intuitive to think attributes are
> children... but what you are asking there you could also say about
> parent nodes - where is it explicit saying that parent nodes are not
> children.
>

Whats really confusing is the element constructors in both XSLT and XQuery treat children which are attribute nodes as children
e.g


<foo>{ attribute {"a"}{"b"} , "c" }</foo>

==>
<foo a="b">c</foo>

So obviously that means attributes are child nodes :)


----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
[email protected]
http://www.xmlsh.org







_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: [email protected]
subscribe: [email protected]
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php


Next in thread → Next in month →