xml-dev

← back

149 messages · 29 threads

# Subject From Date
00040 Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins Manos Batsis 2012-03-01 10:31
00052 Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins Tei 2012-03-01 10:56
00044 Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins Tei 2012-03-01 11:00
00051 Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins [email protected] 2012-03-01 12:34
00005 RE: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins Costello, Roger L. 2012-03-01 13:43
00010 Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins Tei 2012-03-01 15:41
00034 RE: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins Len Bullard 2012-03-01 16:06
00032 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions Rick Jelliffe 2012-03-01 22:53
00030 Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Costello, Roger L. 2012-03-02 13:51
00035 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes David Carlisle 2012-03-02 14:09
00009 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Andrew Welch 2012-03-02 14:15
00007 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Len Bullard 2012-03-02 14:26
00011 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes David Lee 2012-03-02 14:30
00002 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes David Lee 2012-03-02 14:39
00015 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Andrew Welch 2012-03-02 14:46
00000 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes [email protected] 2012-03-02 14:47
00028 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Len Bullard 2012-03-02 15:08
00037 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes David Lee 2012-03-02 15:17
00038 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Richard Salz 2012-03-02 15:23
00027 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes John Cowan 2012-03-02 15:24
00004 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions Len Bullard 2012-03-02 15:28
00012 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Peter Hunsberger 2012-03-02 15:30
00006 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Len Bullard 2012-03-02 15:31
00008 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Dimitre Novatchev 2012-03-02 15:51
00045 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Dimitre Novatchev 2012-03-02 15:54
00024 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes John Cowan 2012-03-02 16:03
00017 CSS Selectors for Fragment Identifiers now a W3C Community Group Simon St.Laurent 2012-03-02 16:17
00048 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions Betty Harvey 2012-03-02 16:27
00020 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions Len Bullard 2012-03-02 16:37
00021 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Uche Ogbuji 2012-03-02 16:44
00049 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Len Bullard 2012-03-02 17:04
00043 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes John Cowan 2012-03-02 17:20
00053 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions John Cowan 2012-03-02 17:29
00041 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Christopher R. Maden 2012-03-02 17:51
00019 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Uche Ogbuji 2012-03-02 17:53
00022 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions Len Bullard 2012-03-02 17:54
00050 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Len Bullard 2012-03-02 18:03
00042 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions John Cowan 2012-03-02 18:05
00046 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions Len Bullard 2012-03-02 18:17
00047 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes John Cowan 2012-03-02 18:21
00023 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Andrew Welch 2012-03-02 18:44
00018 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Uche Ogbuji 2012-03-02 18:52
00025 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Christopher R. Maden 2012-03-02 19:00
00016 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes John Cowan 2012-03-03 04:20
00039 XML is Like a Box of Chocolates Costello, Roger L. 2012-03-04 14:05
00026 Re: [xml-dev] XML is Like a Box of Chocolates Peter Flynn 2012-03-04 18:27
00003 Re: [xml-dev] XML is Like a Box of Chocolates Jim Melton 2012-03-05 17:23
00013 Re: [xml-dev] XML is Like a Box of Chocolates [email protected] 2012-03-05 17:54
00014 Re: [xml-dev] XML is Like a Box of Chocolates Kurt Cagle 2012-03-05 20:38
00001 RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates Cox, Bruce 2012-03-05 22:49
00029 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Cox, Bruce 2012-03-05 22:55
00036 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates Kurt Cagle 2012-03-06 00:54
00031 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates David Lee 2012-03-06 02:35
00033 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates [email protected] 2012-03-06 13:48
00105 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates Mike Sokolov 2012-03-06 21:38
00117 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Len Bullard 2012-03-06 23:18
00076 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates Kurt Cagle 2012-03-06 23:21
00061 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates David Lee 2012-03-06 23:25
00062 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Tei 2012-03-07 13:05
00075 RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes David Lee 2012-03-07 13:23
00118 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Alex Muir 2012-03-07 20:34
00103 Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Liam R E Quin 2012-03-07 22:59
00116 Re: [xml-dev] EXI: was : RE: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What's coming? Stephen Williams 2012-03-08 08:15
00107 Re: [xml-dev] EXI: was : RE: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What's coming? Richard Salz 2012-03-08 14:57
00092 Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Len Bullard 2012-03-08 16:27
00080 RE: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Michael Hopwood 2012-03-08 16:37
00136 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Michael Kay 2012-03-08 16:43
00145 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Michael Hopwood 2012-03-08 16:52
00146 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? [email protected] 2012-03-08 16:57
00135 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? John Cowan 2012-03-08 16:58
00082 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Len Bullard 2012-03-08 17:00
00091 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Len Bullard 2012-03-08 17:02
00078 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Michael Hopwood 2012-03-08 17:04
00093 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? John Cowan 2012-03-08 17:41
00077 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Len Bullard 2012-03-08 18:39
00095 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Greg Hunt 2012-03-08 19:21
00147 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Len Bullard 2012-03-08 19:32
00134 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Dan Brickley 2012-03-08 19:54
00133 anti-xml Andrew Welch 2012-03-08 20:13
00148 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Len Bullard 2012-03-08 20:47
00094 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Cox, Bruce 2012-03-08 21:31
00079 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? John Cowan 2012-03-08 21:56
00090 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Cox, Bruce 2012-03-08 22:20
00081 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Cox, Bruce 2012-03-08 22:26
00114 RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? Cox, Bruce 2012-03-08 23:27
00108 Re: [xml-dev] EXI: was : RE: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What's coming? Stephen Williams 2012-03-08 23:35
00063 Ssx, Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Stephen Williams 2012-03-09 00:02
00074 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? John Cowan 2012-03-09 00:03
00073 RE: [xml-dev] Ssx, Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes Len Bullard 2012-03-09 00:40
00064 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Len Bullard 2012-03-09 02:45
00106 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Liam R E Quin 2012-03-09 03:33
00115 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Liam R E Quin 2012-03-09 03:42
00104 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Ken North 2012-03-09 04:07
00119 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? [email protected] 2012-03-09 12:28
00142 Re: [xml-dev] EXI: was : RE: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What's coming? Richard Salz 2012-03-09 16:05
00127 RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers? Len Bullard 2012-03-10 00:20
00083 Is "visible" a part of the data? Toward the day when the data is the program Costello, Roger L. 2012-03-11 14:33
00101 Re: [xml-dev] Is "visible" a part of the data? Toward the day when the data is the program Peter Hunsberger 2012-03-11 16:25
00100 Re: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What's coming? John Cowan 2012-03-11 19:46
00085 RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Costello, Roger L. 2012-03-12 14:37
00125 Re: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? David Carlisle 2012-03-12 14:51
00143 Re: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? John Cowan 2012-03-12 16:41
00130 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Costello, Roger L. 2012-03-12 17:04
00141 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? David Lee 2012-03-12 17:14
00058 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Costello, Roger L. 2012-03-12 18:12
00067 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? David Lee 2012-03-12 18:20
00120 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Costello, Roger L. 2012-03-13 11:29
00113 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? David Lee 2012-03-13 11:44
00112 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Norm Birkett 2012-03-13 13:10
00121 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Lists DMS 2012-03-13 19:29
00066 [ANN] Release of XMLmind DITA Converter v2.2 Olivier Ishacian 2012-03-14 09:10
00060 Re: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Rick Jelliffe 2012-03-15 01:03
00068 ***Extended deadline: March 26*** COMETS 2012 - 3rd International Track on Collaborative Modeling and Simulation - Call for Papers Daniele Gianni 2012-03-15 22:23
00055 Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey? [redux] Dan Brickley 2012-03-16 13:06
00072 Re: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Simon St.Laurent 2012-03-16 13:24
00054 Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction Toby Considine 2012-03-16 13:47
00111 Re: [xml-dev] Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey? [redux] David Carlisle 2012-03-16 13:49
00122 RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML? Toby Considine 2012-03-16 14:09
00123 Re: [xml-dev] Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction Pete Cordell 2012-03-16 14:13
00110 Re: [xml-dev] Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey? [redux] Mike Sokolov 2012-03-16 14:49
00057 Re: [xml-dev] Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction Michael Kay 2012-03-16 14:52
00069 Re: [xml-dev] Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey? [redux] David Carlisle 2012-03-16 15:09
00059 RE: [xml-dev] Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction Toby Considine 2012-03-16 18:01
00065 [ANN] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v5.2 Olivier Ishacian 2012-03-19 09:32
00131 Re: [xml-dev] Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction Pete Cordell 2012-03-19 11:36
00138 Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Pete Cordell 2012-03-19 13:34
00099 RE: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication David Lee 2012-03-19 13:45
00086 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication John Cowan 2012-03-19 13:57
00089 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Andrew Welch 2012-03-19 14:10
00096 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Pete Cordell 2012-03-19 14:20
00139 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Tei 2012-03-19 14:21
00129 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication John Cowan 2012-03-19 14:36
00144 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Andrew Welch 2012-03-19 14:44
00126 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication John Cowan 2012-03-19 15:01
00088 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Michael Kay 2012-03-19 15:13
00097 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Pete Cordell 2012-03-19 16:52
00140 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Michael Kay 2012-03-19 17:43
00128 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Pete Cordell 2012-03-19 21:00
00132 Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication Mike Sokolov 2012-03-19 21:43
00137 [ANN] Zorba 2.2 "Coeus" is out William Candillon 2012-03-23 10:13
00098 [ANN] BaseX 7.2: The EDBT Release Christian Grün 2012-03-24 18:30
00087 [ANN] Release of XMLmind XSL-FO Converter v4.6.1 Olivier Ishacian 2012-03-26 10:45
00102 [ANN] Open Source XHTML 5 Resources Olivier Ishacian 2012-03-28 08:25
00084 Unique European XML lectures by expert Ken Holman Reinier Kleipool (XML) 2012-03-30 10:38
00124 Validation of complex content Edwin Dankert 2012-03-30 12:35
00109 Boolean XML Toby Considine 2012-03-30 14:48
00056 Re: [xml-dev] Boolean XML G. Ken Holman 2012-03-30 15:05
00070 Re: [xml-dev] Validation of complex content John Cowan 2012-03-30 15:22
00071 Re: [xml-dev] Validation of complex content Michael Kay 2012-03-30 16:34