On 07/16/2012 03:07 PM, David Lee wrote:
>
> Technically true, but if were trying to position MicroXML as "XML Lite" and DataBinding is a key feature,
> then we turn around and say "Oh you need XSD for that to work", I'd just laugh all the way to the bank.
>
>
Yes I agree that would be ludicrous. And I don't think we'd be making bank.
But it would be nice to enable data binding of allow a data binding
layer to interpret elements as *either* a name-value (multi-)map *or* a
sequence. That kind of logic shouldn't be embedded in the parser/data
interchange format. Primitive types, OK. Larger structures seem to me
to go beyond "micro".
