On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 00:11 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> But I repeat, there's no real reason to use MicroXML as an XML replacement,
> particularly not if you have a full XML stack anyway.
That's what we said of XML at first - there's no reason to use XML as an
SGML replacement.
We were in a world in which XML was input to a Netscape plugin.
These things have a habit of either growing like weeds, or of dying by
the wayside unused, so I prefer to prepare for success at least a
little, even if it does not come.
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
