XML 1.0/1.1 doesn't include schema does it? So I don't see why MicroXML
has to include schema in order to support schema-aware programs like
JAXB. One of the good things about schema (unlike DTD) is that it is
layered *on top of* XML not intertwingled with it.
-Mike
On 07/16/2012 01:03 PM, David Lee wrote:
>
>> Doesn't the JAXB model make sense here: push the typing inference to a
>> mapping process that has type awareness in the host language? Different
>>
> Yes, but then JAXB requires Schema.
> Do we pull Schema into MicroXML ?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> David A. Lee
>
> http://www.xmlsh.org
>
>
