RE: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?

From
Len Bullard <>
To
Andrew Welch <>
Date
2012-08-15T13:41:11Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
A user of a financial instrument should be able to point directly to the
exact requirement for the value lists and any constraints.  

I may be ill-informed but I think FpML is used for derivatives.  Can
FpML describe interest rate swaps?  If so:

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-13/business/sns-rt-us-jpmorga
n-lawsuitbre87d00y-20120813_1_bond-issue-interest-rates-outstanding-bond
s

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Welch [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:03 AM
To: Len Bullard
Cc: G. Ken Holman; XML-Dev Mailing list
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?

On 15 August 2012 13:58, Len Bullard <> wrote:
> Given the FpML case where the value constraints can vary by contract

It doesn't though does it?



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com