RE: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?

From
Len Bullard <>
To
Rick Jelliffe <>, "Costello, Roger L." <>
Date
2012-08-14T14:51:17Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
BTW:  I'm not saying proper separation of concerns is a bad thing or
that moving the constraints to the schema is a bad thing.  In FpML it
quite likely is a good thing as far as visibility goes, but the question
was *will* it get traction and I assert that it depends on to whom it
makes a difference that makes a difference and precisely what the
difference is related to organizational goals.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-13/business/sns-rt-us-jpmorga
n-lawsuitbre87d00y-20120813_1_bond-issue-interest-rates-outstanding-bond
s

How should rates for swaps be enumerated if they are managed and
potentially litigated contract by contract?

len