Michael Kay scripsit:
> I have been doing some performance comparisons of different Java XML
> tree models, as used by Saxon, and the results may be of general
> interest:
>
> http://dev.saxonica.com/blog/mike/2012/09/index.html#000194
Indeed they are. I'm glad to see that, of all the models other
than the built-in TinyTree, XOM comes up best overall.
--
No, John. I want formats that are actually John Cowan
useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
address all questions by piling on ridiculous
internal links in forms which are hideously
over-complex. --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev
