Hi Michael,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Michael Kay <> wrote:
>
> It's a shame this change to the semantics of the JAXP API hasn't been
> discussed and agreed on any JAXP mailing list that I'm aware of. If it had,
> then there might be more than one processor that supported it by now.
So, can I take this to mean that SAXON does not support this approach now?
If not:
1) will it in the future?
2) what happens (with SAXON) if I specify the version 1.1 URI now?
Thanks,
Tim
============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook
Google Scholar: http://goo.gl/MMZ1o
