Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?

From
Michael Sokolov <>
To
Shlomi Fish <>
Date
2012-11-15T00:49:49Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?
On 11/14/2012 11:45 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> I have defined an XML grammar titled XML-Grammar-Fortune (see
> http://web-cpan.shlomifish.org/modules/XML-Grammar-Fortune/ ), which I use
> to mark up UNIX-like fortune cookies and quotations (see
> http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/fortunes/ for examples and resultant XHTML
> and plain text outputs), and which is based on XML.
>
Shlomi, you might want to consider using MicroXML 
(http://www.w3.org/community/microxml/), a subset of XML. If you do 
that, you will still be using XML, but will avoid some more complicated 
and probably unnecessary features.

You wouldn't be able to use xml:lang in that case (no prefixes allowed 
in MicroXML): the recommendation there is to use simply a "lang" 
attribute (as you've done with "id").

-Mike