On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:28 PM, David Lee <> wrote:
> We should start with the various national legal systems, see how that goes
> :)
>
> * All laws shall expire after 10 years unless voted to re-instate.
>
> I think that would be awesome.
+++1
>
>
>
> But seriously, how does ISO differ from W3C from a business perspective ?
>
> I am always a tad curious what the real business of standards committees and
> how it varies across committees.
>
> Is it ISO or maybe ANSI that charges for standards documents ? I forget
> which.
Both.
>
> That income then funds future development.
>
> W3C doesn't charge for the standards, instead gets income from members ( who
> in turn get to influence the standards).
>
> That business dynamic may well influence the concept of retiring standards
> as opposed to simply not working more on them.
>
> Just totally guessing here ....
Surely it is part of the business equation; or it wouldn't exist. But
to not be too cynical. I think there are good reasons for having a
mandatory review time frame. I think that W3C just hasn't been around
long enough yet to have seen the need that ISO sees. But the time
will come when it does.
The specific case that I am aware of is with ISO 13606, and yes
technologies that affect it have changed (especially XML) and that may
well effect portions of that specification.
--Tim
============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
Like Us on FB: https://www.facebook.com/mlhim2
Circle us on G+: http://goo.gl/44EV5
Google Scholar: http://goo.gl/MMZ1o
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
