Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Hans-Juergen Rennau <[email protected]> wrote:
--
Michael Kay wrote:"and they [namespaces] add myriad opportunities for doing things wrong."You forgot an item in your list: they offer a unique possibility to get things right when things get really complicated.For example when you do what I presently do: integrate schema information from 283 different schemas. Fortunately they use namespaces - 283 target namespaces - which enables me to keep everything clean without relying on document URIs and or any conventions, and without adding anything to existing structures (like marker attributes). I admit that I miss a lot of fun which I might have if there were no such thing as a target namespace (the shadow of namespaces).
I would start much, much further back and commiserate with you about having to integrate info from 238 different schemas. If I were dealing in an environment that broken I would start by fixing it in my local context. Pipelines much more effective in doing so than namespaces.
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Author, Ndewo, Colorado http://uche.ogbuji.net/ndewo/
Founding editor, Kin Poetry Journal http://wearekin.org
Editor & Contributor, TNB http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Founding editor, Kin Poetry Journal http://wearekin.org
Editor & Contributor, TNB http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji