I've decided to go for the <org.w3c.svg.svg> format.
The plan is to put a C++ microXML parser that supports the convention on
github. It's low priority for me (I'll probably implement it on various
train journeys), but hopefully it will be mostly there for when I have a
need for it.
Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
C++ tools for C++ programmers, http://codalogic.com
Read & write XML in C++, http://www.xml2cpp.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Cordell" <>
To: "Michael Kay" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 7:43 PM
Subject: [xml-dev] <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>
> Hi Michael,
>
> When you've mentioned your namespaces by convention you've given examples
> of both <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg> as top level element names. I
> wondered if you had ever thought long enough about it to decide which
> option you prefer? (If so which?!)
>
> To me <org.w3c.svg> seems prettier, but <org.w3c.svg.svg> more naturally
> embraces org.w3c.svg.rectangle.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pete Cordell
> Codalogic Ltd
> C++ tools for C++ programmers, http://codalogic.com
> Read & write XML in C++, http://www.xml2cpp.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
