Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] Small XML languages versus large XML languages - which is better?

From
Uche Ogbuji <>
Date
2013-11-09T00:33:10Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Small XML languages versus large XML languages - which is better?
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Piotr Bański <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks, Uche,

and regarding this one:

On 11/08/2013 09:54 PM, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
http://www.cloudcomputingexpo.com/node/40468

let me just make sure:

"RELAX NG has gained unexpected momentum largely because it's a much earlier tool for modeling common XML constructs"

Did you mean "easier" or is there a concept of an "early modeling tool" that I have managed to stay unaware of? Asking not to nitpick, but rather because I _could_ imagine RNG, or maybe rather RNC, to be addressed as an "early tool" for modeling.

Yeah that should be "easier." Alas the article's so old I can't imagine I could hunt down the right editor to change it.


--
Uche Ogbuji                                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira                  http://zepheira.com
Author, Ndewo, Colorado                     http://uche.ogbuji.net/ndewo/
Founding editor, Kin Poetry Journal      http://wearekin.org
Editor & Contributor, TNB     http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net    http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji    http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Next in thread → Next in month →