However, I think it's likely that no one who isn't already using xml:id
today is likely to start using it tomorrow.
-Mike
On 02/04/2014 12:13 PM, Michael Kay wrote:
>
> On 4 Feb 2014, at 16:48, Tony Graham <> wrote:
>
>> Since ID is the word of the day, and since CSS F2F minutes always make
>> interesting reading, I draw your attention to "no one uses xml:id any
>> more" about 2/3 of the way down in [1].
>>
> Anyone who says "no-one uses X any more" in this industry is (a) talking through the top of their head, and (b) probably wrong, regardless of the value of X.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
