On Sun, 2014-03-23 at 18:07 -0600, Brian Aberle wrote:
> Liam,
>
> I am mildly poetic and possibly dyslexic so I have much respect for
> Arjun's comment here:
> > >... there's no denying the attraction of short monosyllabic
> substitutes for long-winded terminology. Hence, sadly, the ubiquitous
> misuse of 'tag'.
Yes, Arjun is a smart cookie.
[...]
> In XMLFoundation, you can obtain the address of a member mapped to an
> element or an attribute, the "Tag" in this setting is the C++ string
> of bytes used to assemble the (Attribute or Element) which ever it be.
> What would you call it? Lets not fight about this petty stuff. How
> about contributing an enhancement or helpful comment?
See my separate response from earlier today. I was really replying to
Arjun's question about standard terminology, I'm sorry if that wasn't
clear.
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
