Re: [xml-dev] Defining a language using itself
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Geert Bormans <[email protected]> wrote:
Do you know of other languages that are defined using the language itself?
/Roger
French?
To take this answer more seriously than it was meant: Natural languages are at best described, not defined. We can't begin to provide a complete specification of any natural language as yet.
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures