That¹s a good point!
I think a parallel point would be what the data is like: is it something
that¹s inherently large (i.e. deeply hierarchic and/or with many cross
dependencies between nodes)? Or could it be treated as a series of more
manageable documents?
Again, you¹d tackle the problems with different tools.
T
On 05/03/2015 14:33, "Michael Kay" <> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I have large, complex XML that I want to be able to query using XPath
>>and XQuery.
>
>I have a wide river that I want to cross. How do I go about it? First I
>estimate its width. If I tell people it's 2Km wide, I'm more likely to
>get a sensible answer than if I only tell people it's wide.
>
>We're engineers. We like to measure things. 10Mb and 100Gb are both
>large, but they require different technologies. Complexity can be
>measured too.
>
>Michael Kay
>Saxonica
Oxford University Press (UK) Disclaimer
This message is confidential. You should not copy it or disclose its contents to anyone. You may use and apply the information for the intended purpose only. OUP does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are those of the author only and not of OUP. If this email has come to you in error, please delete it, along with any attachments. Please note that OUP may intercept incoming and outgoing email communications.
