More on Liam's point:
I am watching a future already beginning in which arbitrary natural
language text is analyzed and handled by machine to the point where no
human ever sees the text, or sees it only under exceptional
circumstances. Why on earth would anybody believe that "data [only] for
machines" should or can be limited to a small finite space?
Jim
On 9/24/2015 9:56 AM, Liam Quin wrote:
> On 2015-09-24 10:16, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
>
>> Extrapolating, I see a day where there will only be data for machines,
>> no data for humans (or, relatively very, very little).
>
> Increased computer/computer communication doesn't mean the human
> communication becomes unimportant to humans.
>
--
========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144
Chair, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC32 and W3C XML Query WG Fax : +1.801.942.3345
Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive Alternate email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: SheltieJim at xmission dot com
========================================================================
= Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions =
= only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody =
= else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. =
========================================================================
