Re: [xml-dev] Re: Schemas: Different Strokes From Different Folks

From
John Cowan <>
To
"Henry S. Thompson" <>
Date
2017-01-18T21:36:36Z
ID
<CABzTEQAKe2opGx7qAZ7hCJ=>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Schemas: Different Strokes From Different Folks

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Henry S. Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:

I understood Murata to have proved for RELAX NG that given two XML
languages, each (weakly) generated by a RELAX NG schema, the union _of
the languages_ would be generated by the union of the schemata.

Indeed, the proof is trivial.  Let a be the root pattern of schema A, and b be the root pattern of schema B.  Then <choice><ref name="a"/><ref name="b"/></choice> matches any document that matches either a or b or both.  And since there are no constraints on the subpatterns of a choice pattern other than those inherited from the context of the choice pattern (which here is null), all such patterns are valid.

--
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures