Re: [xml-dev] What are the practical, negative consequences of thinking that attributes are metadata?

From
Thomas Passin <>
To
"" <>
Date
2017-02-16T13:59:49Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] What are the practical, negative consequences of thinking that attributes are metadata?
I still see using XML for little transient Domain Specific Language 
(DSL) type jobs.  That's largely because you can transform the data with 
xslt.  Now that json is coming to xslt (with version 3.0), maybe I'll 
feel like starting to use json instead... we'll have to wait and see.

On 2/16/2017 8:32 AM, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>   Here is kinda how I see it. How do others see it?
> *
> *
> *               |          Fields       |    Literature*
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> *Ephemeral*      | i.e. messages: JSON   |     HTML
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> *Stored *        | i.e. records: XML+XSD |     XML
>
> Rick
>