Re: [xml-dev] What are the practical, negative consequences of thinking that attributes are metadata?
Personally I don't think there's a real danger in thinking some data is metadata: one persons data is another persons metadata, it's the context that matters. Or to put it another way, data (and by extension metadata) without context has no meaning....
Peter Hunsberger
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Costello, Roger L. <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
Consider this XML:
<Book binding="hardcover">
<Title>Software Abstractions</Title>
<Author>Daniel Jackson</Author>
</Book>
I often hear people say that attributes are metadata. For example, @binding is metadata.
David Carlisle likes to remind me that there is nothing in the XML specification which says that attributes are metadata. In fact, the XML specification does not even use the word "metadata."
So when I hear people talking about attributes being metadata, I channel David Carlisle and tell them that attributes are not metadata.
But I'm thinking this is a lost cause. The belief that attributes are metadata is too widespread.
Besides, what difference does it make if people think that attributes are metadata? Can you give me a concrete, practical example showing where bad things happen because someone thought that attributes are metadata?
/Roger
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: [email protected]
subscribe: [email protected]
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php