On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:21:36 +0530, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> I think, when a processor like that for XSD 1.1 is made with java language
> (as in case of Mike I think), we use underlying implementations of
> java.lang.Integer, or the primitive "int" to implement respectively
> xs:integer.
More likely to be java.math.BigInteger, given that the constraints on
java.lang.Integer match primitive int match xs:int rather than
xs:integer, but sure, the point that it's implemented in terms of the
underlying platform stands.
Amy!