xml-dev

← back

34 messages · 6 threads

# Subject From Date
00002 [ANN] Xidel 0.9.8 released Benito van der Zander 2018-04-04 16:14
00000 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Xidel 0.9.8 released Shlomi Fish 2018-04-05 08:29
00001 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Xidel 0.9.8 released Benito van der Zander 2018-04-10 22:43
00020 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Xidel 0.9.8 released Shlomi Fish 2018-04-11 06:48
00024 Should XML applications follow Postel’s Law? Costello, Roger L. 2018-04-12 13:41
00006 Re: [xml-dev]Should XML applications follow Postel’s Law? Geert Bormans 2018-04-12 14:14
00003 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML applications follow Postel’s Law? Rick Jelliffe 2018-04-13 00:34
00004 [ANN] Sirix (Open Source) - a time machine for your data / efficient storage of snapshots as well as navigation in time Johannes Lichtenberger 2018-04-13 15:34
00005 Do package delivery services use data standards for tracking packages? Costello, Roger L. 2018-04-18 18:23
00025 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML applications follow Postel’s Law? Liam R. E. Quin 2018-04-18 21:46
00019 Re: [xml-dev] Do package delivery services use data standards for tracking packages? Timothy Cook 2018-04-18 21:50
00023 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML applications follow Postel’s Law? John Cowan 2018-04-20 02:13
00021 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML applications follow Postel’s Law? Rick Jelliffe 2018-04-20 03:55
00015 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML applications follow Postel’s Law? John Cowan 2018-04-20 04:22
00010 Re: [xml-dev] Should XML applications follow Postel’s Law? Rick Jelliffe 2018-04-20 05:18
00029 KML is very extensible ... but why? Costello, Roger L. 2018-04-20 16:59
00030 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Eliot Kimber 2018-04-20 17:19
00031 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? G. Ken Holman 2018-04-20 17:22
00028 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Michael Kay 2018-04-20 17:31
00012 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Rick Jelliffe 2018-04-21 06:42
00014 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Simon St.Laurent 2018-04-22 21:29
00008 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Patrick Durusau 2018-04-22 21:50
00016 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Simon St.Laurent 2018-04-22 22:04
00007 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Patrick Durusau 2018-04-23 00:02
00018 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Dan Brickley 2018-04-23 00:38
00032 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Simon St.Laurent 2018-04-23 00:56
00027 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Rick Jelliffe 2018-04-23 04:15
00026 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Rick Jelliffe 2018-04-23 04:31
00033 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Michael Kay 2018-04-23 07:15
00017 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Simon St.Laurent 2018-04-23 10:35
00009 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Rick Jelliffe 2018-04-24 06:12
00013 [ANN] Release of XMLmind Word To XML v1.5 Hussein Shafie 2018-04-25 07:27
00011 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Simon St.Laurent 2018-04-25 10:42
00022 Re: [xml-dev] KML is very extensible ... but why? Patrick Durusau 2018-04-25 13:15