Since you mention XProc: The almost-finished XProc 3.0 specification
will initially have two implementations. One of them (XML Calabash 2) is
written in Scala, the other one (Morgana XProc, probably also version 2)
is written in Java. Both run on a JVM, but they are not all implemented
in the same programming language.
On 02.09.2018 17:08, John Dziurlaj wrote:
> In using XML and related standards over the years, XML Schema, XSLT,
> XPath, and SQL/XML, a single number stands out to me: “1.0”.
>
> This is no surprise, as I’ve spent most of my time in the .NET space,
> where Microsoft has not seen fit to update its support of XML standards
> after its initial enthusiasm in the early 2000s. But looking around the
> ecosystem, other platforms aren’t doing much better. Even if you include
> third party libraries, support for the latest specifications is scare.
>
> Support for modern XML technologies is centered around a single
> language, Java. XProc.org lists 6 of the 7 XProc implementations as Java
> based.
>
> Why is this? Is this a problem? (you can guess my answer) What can be
> done to improve the situation?
>
> John Dziurlaj
>
> Elections Consultant
>
> Hilton Roscoe LLC
> Cell 330-714-8935 Work/Fax 234-706-6434
>
--
Gerrit Imsieke
Geschäftsführer / Managing Director
le-tex publishing services GmbH
Weissenfelser Str. 84, 04229 Leipzig, Germany
Phone +49 341 355356 110, Fax +49 341 355356 510
, http://www.le-tex.de
Registergericht / Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Leipzig
Registernummer / Registration Number: HRB 24930
Geschäftsführer / Managing Directors:
Gerrit Imsieke, Svea Jelonek, Thomas Schmidt
