Re: [xml-dev] The problems and the future of the web and a formal internet technology proposal

From
Raphaël Hendricks <>
To
Sir Timothy Berners-Lee <>, Ivan Herman <>, Eric Prud'hommeau <>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <>, , , , , , Liam Quin <>
Date
2021-01-04T22:34:46Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] The problems and the future of the web and a formal internet technology proposal
Hello to all list members. I wish to bring an precision to my first  
message, because a point in a reply makes me suspect that a point was  
not clear in my message and can lead everyone to an erroneous  
understanding

someone answered:
> Mercury is a fine statically-typed, restricted variant of Prolog, and
> even used as implementation language for Prince XML, but if you want
> to push for logical programming on document data,

I wish to say that I was talking about the Mercury language as an  
example, a possibility for the second technological platform, and,  
here is the point which may have been unclear, I recommand that the  
second platform (the remote software execution platform) give-up all  
HTML/XML baggage, it should use pure software code, no page/markup  
stuff of any kind. Some may have accidently been led to think that I  
am pushing XML for both platforms, this is not the case. I am not  
pushing for logical programming on document data as is being suggested.

Raphaël Hendricks