>But, but, but, ... Why is space required between attributes? Surely
>a parser can recognize the start of the next attribute given the
>end-delimiter of the previous attribute's value, yes?
Because when XML was pulled together in the mid-1990's it was made to
be an application of SGML from the early-1980's (retroactively
modified a bit to accommodate some of the decisions made in XML).
Such a decision would have made an instance of XML not an instance of SGML.
And just because something is unambiguous doesn't make it meaningful
to implement.
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . Ken
At 2021-02-04 18:18 +0000, Roger L Costello wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>Is the following XML well-formed?
>
><altitude units="meters"reference="AGL">1000</altitude>
>
>Scroll down to see the answer ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>No! It is not well-formed. There must be a space before
>reference="AGL" like so:
>
><altitude units="meters" reference="AGL">1000</altitude>
>
>But, but, but, ... Why is space required between attributes? Surely
>a parser can recognize the start of the next attribute given the
>end-delimiter of the previous attribute's value, yes?
>
>/Roger
>
>_____________
--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) |
Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman |
