Comments from Jerome Jump

These don't sound like changes requiring a new draft, but 
if we do have a new draft, they should get integrated.

 

    -Gabe

From: Jerome Jump [mailto:] 

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:51 AM
To: Wachob, 
Gabe
Cc: Chetan Sabnis; Dave McAlpin
Subject: XRI Resolution 
V2.0

Gabe,

     In 
reviewing Committee Draft 01, 14 March 2005 of the Extensible Resource 
Identifier (XRI) Resolution V2.0, I came across the 
following:

 

1)       
On line 864:  I believe the 
constructed XRI should be “xri://@example2…” instead of “xri://=example2…”. 
 This is because the external synonym (line 859) contains an “@”, not an 
“=”.  Or, change line 859 so that it says “xri://=example2”.  In any 
case, the two should be consistent.

2)       
A lot of the XML, while correct, 
should be reformatted for easier reading by a 
human.

 

     Other than 
that, the specs look pretty good.

 

-Jerome M. 
Jump

Epok, 
Inc