I agree that the concept of groups is useful, but I also think that it
exists at a higher level of abstraction than XRIs do. By definition, XRIs
refer to resources. There is no reason that one type of resource couldn't
be a group of resources.
Mike
> > GENERAL COMMENTS
> >
> > * Do we need to mention addresses that support the concept
> of "multicast"
> or
> > "broadcast"? More generally, do we need to have a concept
> of "groups" in
> XRI
> > (as distinct from individual resources).
> >
>
> Concept of groups is very useful. We were doing some
> prototyping on XNS
> server for last 3 months, and "group identity" was very useful.
