RE: [xri] Resolution Simplification

From
Loren West <>
Date
2003-09-03T18:50:03+00:00
ID
002201c3724f$0b114590$6401a8c0@TABLETPC
Thread
RE: [xri] Resolution Simplification
Title: Message

Hi 
Gabe,

 

This 
document is a welcome addition to the specification.  I had been putting 
off grokking the old resolution spec until I got around to understanding DDDS 
(which, by the way, never happened).

 

This 
version is simple and straight forward.  I could write this client and 
server in my sleep - which makes writing it for real simply a porting 
project...

 

=Loren

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Wachob, Gabe 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:26 
  AM
To: ''
Subject: [xri] 
  Resolution Simplification

  
XRI 
  Members-

  
    Its become rather clear to me that one of the impediments to getting 
  feedback on the XRI spec is the density of the Resolution section and its 
  reliance on DNS technologies thats folks are very unfamiliar with (e.g. DDDS). 
  

  
 

  
    Towards the goal of getting XRI traction, I'm proposing a much simpler 
  resolution process that focuses almost entirely on HTTP rather than trying to 
  provide a framework for pluggable resolution. This proposal is 6 pages long 
  (rather than the current 15-16 pages). No flowcharts!

  
 

  
    I've spoken with Dave McAlpin and we've got a pretty clear path for 
  doing secure resolution with it as well. My proposal doesn't lay out those 
  details, but rather suggests where the hooks are for doing secure resolution. 
  

  
 

  
    I'm pretty confident that this simplification is a great step forward 
  as it makes resolution a much more conventional process that relies more 
  directly on HTTP. 

  
 

  
    Please see the attached document and send feedback to the list or to 
  myself. No decision has been made (obviously), but I'm hoping this proposal 
  gets a general initial thumbs up. Its certainly a lot more understandable. 
  Section 3.1 of the -07 draft is largely still applicable - so it might be 
  useful to read that before you read this proposal.

  
 

  
    -Gabe