I agree with Loren,
Furthermore, I recommend trying hard NOT to take D.
Xavier.
--
Xavier Serret. Tel: +33 (0)442 36 4543
-----Original Message-----
From: Loren West [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:17 AM
To: 'Drummond Reed';
Subject: RE: [xri] Status of secure resolution
TC members,
In my opinion, A or B are preferable, but lacking a volunteer, C is
acceptable.
=Loren
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:32 AM
> To:
> Subject: [xri] Status of secure resolution
>
>
> XRI TC Members:
>
> As we head into final preparation of the XRI Syntax and Resolution
> Specification 1.0 Committee Draft, Xavier Serret has raised
> the question
> that we left open at the end of our f2f last February: what is the
> status of secure resolution? Are we going to:
>
> a) Cover it normatively in the 1.0 spec,
> b) Cover it non-normatively in the 1.0 spec (say, in an appendix),
> c) Cover it in a subsequent specification from the XRI TC, or
> d) Leave it to the soon-to-be-proposed XDI TC?
>
> We need to close on this quickly so we know how we will treat
> the issue
> in the 08 (gold candidate) draft, so please take a moment to post your
> opinion relative to the above options.
>
> =Drummond
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from
> the roster of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave
_workgroup.php.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave_workgroup.php
.
