Before you respond to my other email, could you spell out exactly what
the motivation for this proposal is? Specifically what gap in CD-01 are
you addressing?
-Gabe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Churchill [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:44 PM
> To:
> Subject: [xri] Bracketing Refs [Authority Resolution]
>
>
>
> This proposes a bracketing scheme for outputting Refs during
> the authority
> resolution phase. This provides a human and machine readable way to
> negotiate a nested Ref resolution hierarchy.
>
> <XRDS>
>
> <XRD-A />
> <RefRes>
> <XRD-E />
> <RefRes>
> <XRD-H />
> </RefRes>
> <XRD-F />
> <XRD-G />
> </RefRes>
> <XRD-B />
> <XRD-C />
> <RefRes>
> <XRD-I />
> </RefRes>
> <XRD-D />
>
> </XRDS>
>
>
> The <RefRes> element is used to bracket the XRDs necessary to
> resolve a Ref.
> The <RefRes> element MUST appear between two <XRD> elements.
> (It would never
> fall at the beginning or end, and two <RefRes> elements would
> never appear
> together.)
>
> The final <XRD> in the <RefRes> is that used for the
> subsegment resolution
> of the <XRD> that follows the <RefRes>. Therefore, in the
> example above, the
> subsegment resolution XRD chain is:
>
> G, B, I, D
>
> Note that, since the <RefRes> "replaces" the preceding <XRD> from a
> subsegment resolution standpoint, the number of (top-level)
> XRDs in the
> <XRDS> is always equal to the number of authority subsegments.
>
> ~ Steve
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all
> your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
> oups.php
>
>
