RE: [xri] Proposal for a Telecon to close the Normal Forms issue

From
Wachob, Gabe <>
Date
2006-06-02T20:40:12+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xri] Proposal for a Telecon to close the Normal Forms issue
I could do either.

 

Honestly, I'd prefer 4 on Monday to 4 on Friday 
;-)

 

Though I have to keep it to about an hour in either case. 

 

    -Gabe

  

  
  From: Tan, William 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 11:45 
  AM
To: Drummond Reed; 
Subject: 
  RE: [xri] Proposal for a Telecon to close the Normal Forms 
  issue

  

  

  
Since no one else has 
  signed up yet, may I propose Monday 4pm PT?

  
 

  

  
=wil (http://xri.net/=wil)

  
 

  
 

  

  

  

  
  

  
From: 
  Drummond Reed [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 3:20 
  PM
To: Tan, William; 
  
Subject: RE: [xri] Proposal for a Telecon 
  to close the Normal Forms issue

  
 

  
Wil,

  
 

  
I could do 4pm PT 
  tomorrow (Friday). Can anyone else join then?

  
 

  
Best,

  
 

  
=Drummond 
  

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: 
  Tan, William 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 7:13 
  PM
To: 
  
Subject: [xri] Proposal for a Telecon to 
  close the Normal Forms issue

  
 

  
Due to time constraint we were not 
  able to address the issue that I raised about the XRI/IRI/URI NF 
  issues.

  
I propose a separate conference 
  call for those who are interested. Attached is the email on the current 
  thread. 

  
 

  
Currently, the only agenda item 
  is:

  
 

  
Does the parser have any issue 
  distinguishing XRI vs. IRI normal form? If so, how do we address the issue of 
  ambiguity? Gabe explained that it has been discussed on the TC before and a 
  conclusion was reached on the matter.

  
 

  
Because I’m in the outback time 
  zone it is difficult to accommodate both US 
  east coast and west coast time; the 4pm PT slot seems to work for everyone so 
  I’d propose that. If possible, we can do one tomorrow (Friday 4pm PT). 
  Otherwise, any day next week is fine by me too. Another possible time would be 
  8 – 9am PT.

  
 

  
Thanks.

  
 

  
=wil (http://xri.net/=wil)