I am going to stop arguing for dns: which is a valid URI for a host.
The problem with a URN in the OASIS space would be that it needs to
include the host name to match the CN of the signing cert.
The info: scheme is also possible, but probably confusing.
What is the appropriate URI for a HOST.
John B.
On 25-Aug-09, at 4:00 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
>> Seems like we have consensus on this (if anyone disagrees, please
>> shout
>> now).
>
> I don't like it or agree with the premise all that much, but I won't
> stand
> in the way of it.
>
> For the record, what *I* would do if I had the need is to use a URN
> namespace, either OASIS' or something else applicable, and define a
> convention to represent the needed concept.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
