On Aug 11, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Will Norris wrote:
> agreed, that makes a lot of sense. Not sure where I got the "must
> not be used" language... I may have added that myself.
ah, it is on this schema wiki page: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XrdOne/XrdSchema
. In that case, Drummond, do you remember how that language was
added? By comparison, XRI Resolution 2.0 simply stated:
> The date/time, in the form of xs:dateTime, after which this XRD
> cannot be relied upon.
so I think dropping the "must not" language is more consistent with
that.
-will
