RE: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2009-09-09T01:15:01+00:00
ID
01ce01ca30ea$eec4dd00$cc4e9700$@
Thread
RE: [xri] Removing ds elements from schema
Nat Sakimura wrote on 2009-09-08:
> So the conclusion is to drop <extensions> and recommend to use only one
> signature, is that right?

Recommend, or at least confine the definition within the specification to
that.

-- Scott