Maybe just pointing people to dublin core would be sufficient? People
seem to use it enough with HTML.
Also, has anyone noticed that XRD is becoming surprisingly close to a
collection of XLink simple elements that's actually useful? The only
other stuff they have is xlink:show, for how to render the link,
notably useful for embedding; and xlink:actuate, for what sort of
event activates the link. These would only be useful for embedding XRD
into rendered documents like HTML or ODF, say in a profile page or
resume. Totally not today's use cases, but maybe XRD 2.
Also, +1 to xml:lang
---
http://josephholsten.com
On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> All the other link structures (header, element) provide a link-level
> title with language support. Should we add something like that to
> stay consistent? This is extremely useful in building UI for editing
> and presenting XRD documents to users, especially in the social
> space which is an important target for us. This came up in pretty
> much every place XRDS-Simple was discussed.
>
> It will look something like this:
>
> <Title lang='en-us'>A very special link</Title>
>
> Cardinality is 0 to any. 'lang' is optional and does not have a
> default value is omitted. It will use a standard languages code spec
> (whatever is the prevailing reference today).
>
> EHL
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
