RE: [xri] Fwd: Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-10-08

Will Norris wrote on 2009-10-09:
> We did the same thing for xml:id on <XRD>.  All other things being
> equal, I think I'd rather err on the side of being more explicit in
> the schema, for those people who don't read the text of the spec as
> closely as they should.  What's your opinion?  Were you pointing it
> out simply to ensure we knew it was redundant, or do you actually
> prefer leaving it out?

Just to make sure, and I guess also to note that anywhere you have an
attribute wildcard like that, you also implicitly permit xml:lang too.

-- Scott