RE: [xri] Re: Proposal for an X.509-based XRI Trust Profile

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2010-01-21T23:40:56+00:00
ID
02a301ca9af3$29481240$7bd836c0$@
Thread
RE: [xri] Re: Proposal for an X.509-based XRI Trust Profile
Breno de Medeiros wrote on 2010-01-21:
> 2. Allow root certificates to equal the signer certificate, in which
> case the certificate matching step is not performed. I think this does
> not add too much complexity to the spec.

You'll probably have to nail that down fairly explicitly, e.g., If the
signing certificate is not equal (byte for byte) to a trusted certificate,
then perform matching as follows...

Strictly speaking, I think a trust anchor will "validate" with depth 0
against the set of trust anchors and some code may not be able to tell the
difference easily.

-- Scott