Re: [xri] Property, rel comparison

>
> Right, I just meant whether you were saying that a single reference to
> standard normalization (which is scheme specific) will cover everything. If
> so, then we should just reference that in the URI text up in section 1.
>

Agree.

> If there's additional text needed for any non-URI matching, we need the text
> on that now. We can't change it later and we can't reference a non-finished
> document at IETF, obviously.
>

Nothing comes to mind.

--Breno