dita — archive

RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA

From: Rob Frankland
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:29:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















dita message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA




From: "Rob Frankland" <[email protected]>
To: "'Paul Prescod'" <[email protected]>,       "'JoAnn Hackos'" <[email protected]>,       "'Don Day'" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:28:41 -0800














I agree, having followed this thread. Your
suggested solution covers both use cases. I believe the largest number of users
will want the HTML/Docbook usage and this enables the programmer writers to
meet their needs as well.



Rob











From: Paul Prescod
[mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 5:46
PM

To: JoAnn Hackos; Don Day

Cc: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in
DITA







Okay, an emerging consensus seems to be
that <keyword> in <keywords> means <keyword> in the
HTML/Docbook sense.





http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/keyword.html .
It is typically hidden from the user as metadata and embedded in the HTML meta
tag.





 





<keyword> in other contexts is more
like a word from an API or language.





 





Should we just document it that way? If
so, I can suggest some wordings.





 





 Paul Prescod





 















References:

RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: "Paul Prescod" <[email protected]>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]