dita — archive

RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA

From: JoAnn Hackos
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:43:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















dita message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA




From: "JoAnn Hackos" <[email protected]>
To: "Rob Frankland" <[email protected]>,"Paul Prescod" <[email protected]>,"Don Day" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:48:25 -0700









Sounds like a good solution.
 
JoAnn 
JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD
President
Comtech Services, 
Inc.
710 Kipling Street, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80215
303-232-7586
[email protected]
http://www.comtech-serv.com 
 




From: Rob Frankland 
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:29 
AM
To: 'Paul Prescod'; JoAnn Hackos; 'Don Day'
Cc: 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in 
DITA




I agree, having 
followed this thread. Your suggested solution covers both use cases. I believe 
the largest number of users will want the HTML/Docbook usage and this enables 
the programmer writers to meet their needs as well.

Rob





From: Paul 
Prescod [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 5:46 
PM
To: JoAnn Hackos; Don 
Day
Cc: 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in 
DITA


Okay, an emerging 
consensus seems to be that <keyword> in <keywords> means 
<keyword> in the HTML/Docbook sense.

http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/keyword.html . 
It is typically hidden from the user as metadata and embedded in the HTML meta 
tag.

 

<keyword> in 
other contexts is more like a word from an API or 
language.

 

Should we just document 
it that way? If so, I can suggest some 
wordings.

 

 Paul 
Prescod

 





Follow-Ups:

Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: Dana Spradley <[email protected]>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]