Re: [docbook-apps] semantics of "replaceable" element.

[Stefan Seefeld <stefan@seefeld.name>]

On 11/05/2012 08:13 PM, Bob Stayton wrote:
> I checked the archives, and apparently these templates that add a
> comma in the context of the function element were added very early in
> the XSL development, back in 2001.  Given the variety of elements that
> function can contain, including indexterms,and the variety of contexts
> in which function can appear, including para, does anyone think these
> generated commas are appropriate?  Are there more restricted contexts
> where they might be appropriate?  If we eliminate the generated
> commas, would that mess up a lot of output?
>
> For now, I would suggest that you

...use a customization layer to suppress the unwanted commas ?

Yes, I can certainly do that. :-)

Thanks,
        Stefan

-- 

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...