legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[legalxml-courtfiling] Updated Standard for Specification Testing
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Updated Standard for Specification Testing
- From: "Krause, Catherine" <[email protected]>
- To: " ([email protected])"<[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 17:51:23 -0700
Title: Updated Standard for Specification Testing
All:
Attached is the updated Standard for Specification Testing, updated per feedback received on the list during the past week.
I did not find anything controversial about any of the suggestions, so I incorporated all of them. I believe that this is ready for presentation to the Joint Technology Committee July 21st.
I would comment that I do feel strongly that the scope of test criteria should not extend beyond the specification being tested. But, I did add John Messing's suggested statement "unless expressly incorporated from another document." My feeling is that if a subcommittee wanted to propose incorporating other test criteria from related documents, it would then be up to the TC as a whole during the review for the specification as to whether or not that was something that everyone could live with for a specific specification's test criteria.
Note that I will be out of the office and unavailable July 18th - July 21st, so I will not be able to make any further changes over the next few days. That should not (hopefully) be necessary.
Thanks for your feedback! This should be a good basis for specification testing for all of our future TC work products.
E-Filing Project Manager
King County Department of Judicial Administration
(206)296-7860
<<Testing Recommendations, v4.doc>>
Attachment:
Testing Recommendations, v4.doc
Description: MS-Word document
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC