OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  legalxml-courtfiling  ·  2002-09

legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple aseReview by September 24t h


 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple aseReview by September 24t h


Title: Query and Response Specification - Please Review by September 24th
Relatively minor questions and observations:
 
1:
"Wherever possible, the parameterName should coincide with the established elements and attributes of the LegalXML data dictionary and contain the same information"
 
Remove the "Wherever possible,"
 
2:
How about a Boolean parameter on the query to eliminate the query labels in the response.
 
3:
Within a standard query why not allow the requested columns in the response? The columns would have to be applicable to the query (i.e. couldn't request charges within a getCaseActorRole).
 
gary


[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]