legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple aseReview by September 24t h
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple aseReview by September 24t h
- From: "Poindexter, Gary W" <[email protected]>
- To: "Rowley, Moira" <[email protected]>,"'[email protected]'"<[email protected]>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 20:37:48 -0500
Title: Query and Response Specification - Please Review by September 24th
Relatively minor questions and
observations:
1:
"Wherever possible, the parameterName
should coincide with the established elements and attributes of the LegalXML
data dictionary and contain the same information"
Remove the "Wherever possible,"
2:
How about a Boolean parameter on the query to eliminate
the query labels in the response.
3:
Within a standard query why not allow the requested
columns in the response? The columns would have to be applicable to the query
(i.e. couldn't request charges within a getCaseActorRole).
gary
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] — [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Month Index] | [List Home]