OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  legalxml-courtfiling  ·  2002-09

legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple aseReview by September 24t h


 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple aseReview by September 24t h


Title: Query and Response Specification - Please Review by September 24th
Dear All,
 
Continue the good work on this Spec. As a voice from afar - Australia, what you have done would seem to fit our situation as well.
 
My comments on the Issues & Notes
 
Segregating Normative Queries - Agree and do it sooner rather than later
Sub-elements or attributes - prefer Sub-elements but not wedded to them
totalParameters - why have this, it just seems like an unnecessary overhead
responseRow - as long as we stay in synch with Court Filing
getActorRole - this seems to be the subject of some discussion at the moment, so may be we let some "water flow under this particular bridge" before committing
getCaseActorList - Yes put this in the normative queries
Authentication - I am in 2 minds on this as I think we will need to carry optional elements for authentication, but yet I do not know what the privileges will be or the number of different privileges. We are just going through this body of work at the moment and we are currently envisaging 7 levels of privilege (which seems a lot - hopefully we can cut it down). Of course this could vary greatly from one state to another, and one country to another. This makes it difficult to have any level of specificity at this stage.
Security - I would prefer that this is not in the Q/R Specification. Its best left out with a note stating so at the front of the Spec.
 
No further comments on the Standards Draft it looks good.
 
Steven Taylor
Project Director
e-Business Transformation
Courts Administration Authority
South Australia 


[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]